Dualism gives the “good” Muslim plausible deniability when they say that jihadists are not “real” Islam. This dualism accounts for the two types of Muslims–the good Muslim at work and the Taliban Muslim. Our unitary logic says that if two things contradict, then one of them is false So in Islam both sides of a contradiction can be true. But the earlier Koran is still true it was given by Allah. The Koran gives a rule for removing the contradiction by saying that the later Koran “abrogates” the early Koran. The later political Koran written in Medina frequently contradicts the early religious Koran written in Mecca.
Islam has one set of ethics for Muslims and another set of ethics for the kafir–dualistic ethics. A Muslim is not to lie to another Muslim a kafir may be deceived or not. A Muslim is not to kill another Muslim a kafir may be killed, or not. The Koran also establishes dualism with its ethical system. The Trilogy (Koran, Sira and Hadith) says that every kafir in the world must submit to political Islam. The word “kafir” illustrates both of political Islam’s principles–submission and duality. Every single reference to the kafirs is negative, offensive and hateful. The Hadith and the Sira agree with the Koran. The Koran says that a kafir (unbeliever) can be robbed, killed, tortured, mocked, insulted, beheaded, raped, crucified and on and on. Islam’s treatment of us can be found in one word–kafir. The only thing that kafirs care about is how Islam treats us. There are many kinds of reform possible to Islam, but does anyone care if they reformed prayer by praying towards LA rather than Mecca? No. But the apologists never get around to saying what the reform would be. After all, Christianity and Judaism have been reformed. Islam’s apologists say that Islam just needs a reform. (Thanks to Islam-Watch and Alamgir Hussain)Īl Qaeda control of Iraqi prisons. (Thanks to )Ī historical perspective on the Islamic symbolism of the bombing of the World Trade Towers.
0 kommentar(er)
